Mental components of Emotional purification
Fundamental Differences between Brain and Mind
Mind must differentiate from Brain
The Pollution Equation for Mind and Brain
Probability of Polluted Behavior
Necessity of Purification to achieve Transformation
General Pollution Equation for Metal Ore
Combination before Mixture
Four Functions of Pollution and Purification
A Geometric Representation of ‘a = A - bi’
Polluted always detracts from the Real
Distraction of Imaginary wastes energy on Side Path
Mixture, much more complicated
2 Strategies to avoid moving in the wrong direction
Self Reflection, the tool to reduce Pollution, is Polluted
Regular Mind cleaning necessary
The Pollution of the True by the False
Corrupt Investigators makes Mixture difficult to deal with
True Behavior based in Intuitions - uncorrupted by Emotions
True Behavior based in Awareness, while False based in Oblivion
When Truth is replaced by Falsehood
People living primarily in the Imaginary World
Each of us are both Guru and Victim
Proactive Guru vs. Reactive Victim
Probabilities of Action, not states of Being
All of us are more or less culturally corrupted
Even Proactive component polluted
The Probability of True or False behavior
Problems when the Probability of False Behavior is High
One leads us off the Path - the other Returns us
Joe goes down the Wrong Path but finds his way back
Pay Attention or Cultivate Conscious Awareness
Sometimes Rewiring is Essential
Not Scientific: Just trying to communicate
Our operators, + & *, aren’t really Addition & Multiplication
Applied to Self and Delusion
Reality Turned Inside Out
Examples of Music and Exercise
All explication based upon Metaphor
Differentiation between Reality and our Mathematics
Hoping to trigger Transformation
Truth and Falsehood unattached to Dogma
Beyond Dogma to the Inherent Nature of True and False
The Discovery of the Pollution Equation - beyond Deduction
First the Internal Resonance, then Deductive Logic takes over
Roughly Defining Components of Behavior Probability
Inverted Realities and Veering from the Course
Isomorphism between QED and this Theory of Behavior Probabilities
Similarity between subatomic particles and thots
Opposite possibilities cancel each other out
Accelerating Probability of Alternate behavior
Introducing Decaying Averages
Living Vectors: dependent upon what went before, rather than independent
Always something new because the past is always different
Sum of all Individual Probability Vectors equals General Vector
Vectors represent Probabilities not Events
Decay is relative - not absolute
Four basic choices at any time
Each based in probabilities founded in past behavior
Review: R/L/D Anger Example
Applying the Probability Notation
Applied to the R, D, L example
Success determined by external response to Behavior
Evaluation of Success determined solely by Source of Behavior
Underlying message: Behave and No Pain; Don’t Behave and Pain.
Top-down organization unstable because based in External Force
Perception of success:
A function of internal criteria and external behavior
R’s Success: Change L’s Probability Vector
Extreme Pain and Pleasure drastically alters Behavior Probabilities
Generally the Greatest Force Wins
Punished Examines Abuser Carefully
Self Reflection leads to an appropriate response to Pain
R attempts to suppress L’s revolt
Pain must be inflicted to radically change behavior
Sometimes Intimidation - Threat of Violence - enough
Simple ‘+ & –’ Reinforcement Mechanical
L’s Probability Vector Multi-Dimensional
‘Should’ walls in collision
L Angry that R made her Mad
L’s Disturbance is D’s Disturbance
Because ‘Should’ walls generate anger when pushed,
They Must be Consciously Deconstructed
First put the Fire out -
But Don’t forget to Deconstruct the Wall
Home The Firing Process V. Differentiation Previous Next Comments